On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 10:27:28AM +0100, Matthew Bull wrote:
> There have been several discussions on the list in the last few months
> about trying to get PyGTK into the standard library, and whilst
> attending europython recently I had an opportunity to steer
> conversations in that direction with a lot of people to get a feel for
> the (european at least) communities take on this, most of the people I
> spoke to where non PyGTK folks, and the opinions seemed to be generally
> favourable.
[snip numerous arguments in favor of including pygtk]
Summarizing the issues presented in this thread, we have the following
topics that want evaluation:
- Combined Release
- API Stability
- Tkinter, KDE and Python advocacy
- Non-GTK+ packages
- MacOS functionality
- Use of Python's development infrastructure
- Distribution of documentation
I'm not even going to try fleshing these out, but whoever wants to argue
about inclusion needs to take these into serious consideration.
One thing that popped up were two potential projects that somebody with
some free time or a lot of love for Python and PyGTK could try tackling:
- IDLE Port
- Integrated RAD Tool
Thanks for chipping in with opinions and proposals,
--
Christian Robottom Reis | http://async.com.br/~kiko/ | [+55 16] 261 2331
_______________________________________________
pygtk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk
Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/
