> Speaking of this patch, we should start discussion on whether we want it > in for 2.4 or not. Johan (and someone else?) has expressed reservations > because he feels that most of it duplicates functionality already in the > Python standard library. I'm sure you have a good argument against that > one already :-)
Not the g_log_set_handler, I'd like to have them in. It's mostly the GIOChannel I don't want in which I think you're confusing. The patch actually wraps both so I can't blame you for that. -- Johan Dahlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ pygtk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/
