> -----Messaggio originale----- > Da: Cedric Gustin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Inviato: mercoled� 16 giugno 2004 15.43 > A: John Hunter > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Oggetto: Re: [pygtk] Installation problems win32 >
... > pygtk/gtk+-2.4. Currently, I recommend the one provided by the > gladewin32 project (http://gladewin32.sourceforge.net) for pygtk-2.3.x > (and gtkmm-2.4 !!!), but this means checking for different registry > entries and installation paths. Does it support Gimp 2? And does the Gimp 2 runtime support pygtk and Glade? > I think Tor Lillqvist does not want to tag an installer as "official", > following the rules of the gnome project (no official > binaries. Only the > source tarballs are official). If only source tarballs are official, maybe the GTK+, Glade, Pango etc. maintainers could standardize and adopt into the official source tarballs and documentation: - all Win32 code, to avoid incompatible hacks (why should different installers for the same version have different bugs?) - one or more supported Win32 compilers (I suggest the latest Mingw GCC and maybe the freeware Microsoft Visual C .Net compiler) - file names and locations and directory structures (DLLs, themes, configuration files; libXyz.dll vs. Xyz.dll is particularly annoying, for example) - registry entries for the installation of every component (so pygtk and other dependent applications can use them) - scripts and other source files for popular installer tools like NSIS, InnoSetup etc. (to avoid duplicated and incorrectly duplicated work) Then, with all these constraints in place, whoever makes an installer is likely to make a correct and compatible one. I'm not a GTK+ expert, but maybe I could help with some of this work. Lorenzo Gatti _______________________________________________ pygtk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/
