> > I find the fact that we would need to 
> > break apart 
> > packages a bit annoying (and potentially a burden for releases and 
> > etc).
> 
> That would seem to be a problem. It is a fairly arbitrary 
> imposition, so an unnecessary use (waste) of time in the longer term.

I've explained the reasons at length. But to summarise: We don't put
unstable stuff in the GNOME Platform so we won't put unstable stuff in the
GNOME Platform Bindings. And we won't put stuff in the GNOME Platform
Bindings if it isn't a binding for the GNOME Platform.
 
> My main disappointment in the "proposal" at the moment is 
> that whilst it should still be in proposal status it is being 
> pitched like a done deal.

I have given everybody time to respond, and received the explicit blessing
of the GNOME Board and release team, but we can't wait forever. The schedule
must start and releases must be made. I have given pygtk extra time by
creating a December 22nd deadline for tarball submissions.

Murray Cumming
www.murrayc.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
pygtk mailing list   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk
Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/

Reply via email to