I suppose it's possible that the (smaller) copy is somehow the same size as the original, which would explain the memory consumption, so the bug might be in scale_simple. But I was just wondering if this is a known problem or what. I can't find anything about it other than an unanswered message to this list a few months ago.
_______________________________________________ pygtk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/
