Sorry, I misread. I see what you're saying. This is like what I was
proposing w/ hiera. The trouble is that it's not really R&P then as has
been brought up by jcbollinger.
On Tuesday, November 5, 2019 at 5:27:33 PM UTC-7, Alan Evans wrote:
>
> Hey Karsten thank you for your thoughts.
>
> On Tuesday, November 5, 2019 at 1:52:12 AM UTC-7, Karsten Heymann wrote:
>>
>> Hi Alan,
>>
>> I would simply do
>>
>> class profile::base { include profile::wazuh }
>>
>> class profile::wazuh (
>> Boolean $manager = False
>> ) {
>> if $manager {
>> include profile::wazuh::manager
>> }
>> else {
>> include profiles::wazuh::agent
>> }
>>
>> and be set with it.
>>
>> Then you don't need the following:
>> class role::wazuh::manager { include profile::wazuh::manager }
>> because every node already includes profile::wazuh via profile::base
>>
>
> The trouble here is that the way the module works is that a node can only
> be a wazuh::agent or wazuh::manager. If a node had both it would have
> duplicate resource definitions. For example File{'/var/ossec/ossec.conf':}
> is used by both the agent and the manager but they're different.
>
> I think I mentioned this in a paragraph I edited out of my original email.
>
>
>> Best
>> Karsten
>>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-users/2884be7e-cc1e-4ffd-a8f0-9963700ca4d5%40googlegroups.com.
