> On 22 Jun 2017, at 15:42, jcbollinger <[email protected]> wrote: > > > So why not go with that? The link owner is relevant only to modifying or > removing the link itself, and since you're managing it via Puppet, I don't > see what purpose it serves to relax the permissions for that. The link owner > and permissions have no relevance to traversing the link (see symlink(7)).
E.g. postgres does not work when the data dir is a link not owned by the postgres user Martin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-users/CF40587E-8E3A-4234-9A5E-987B3D6D52E0%40gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
