Hunter

Thanks for the updated gem. Will give it a go when I have a few mins :) 

Cheers
Gav

On Tuesday, 10 June 2014 00:05:40 UTC+1, Hunter Haugen wrote:
>
> Sorry about that; I was thinking of mocha as more of an extraneous 
> dependency rather than a feature. Turns out that the mock_with :mocha line 
> was a "feature" of puppetlabs_spec_helper and removing it changed the 
> behavior of projects which depend on PSH. That's what I get for releasing 
> on friday...
>
> I have released 0.5.1 which adds back the mocha dependency and mock_with 
> :mocha.
>
> Eventually I would like to see puppetlabs_spec_helper's helpful features 
> (like the puppet indirection initialization adapter pattern code and 
> fixtures) move into rspec-puppet, and its muddled/questionable aspects 
> resolved as to whether they should be removed or migrated into another more 
> appropriate place. At least the module team now owns this code and it can 
> start moving again.
>
>
>
> -Hunter
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Garrett Honeycutt <
> [email protected] <javascript:>> wrote:
> On 6/9/14, 12:49 PM, Clayton O'Neill wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 11:23 AM, fatmcgav <[email protected] 
> <javascript:>
> > <mailto:[email protected] <javascript:>>> wrote:
> >
> >     Afternoon all,
> >
> >     Just thought I'd make the lists aware of an issue I hit with
> >     puppetlabs_spec_helper v0.5.0 today.
> >
> >     It would appear that changes committed in [1] results in the
> >     dropping of mocha as a dependency, and therefore any tests depending
> >     on mocha failing.
> >     The error I was seeing was:
> >
> >     
> Failure/Error:Puppet::Type.type(:application).stubs(:defaultprovider).returns
> >     described_class
> >
> >     NoMethodError:
> >
> >     undefined method `stubs' for Puppet::Type::Application:Class
> >
> >     # ./spec/unit/puppet/provider/application/asadmin_spec.rb:6
> >
> >     A work-around for me was to pin puppetlabs_spec_helper to v0.4.x. [2]
> >
> >
> > I just ran into the same problem.  Is this a bug, or a change in API?  I
> > also worked around it via '~> 0.4.1'.
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Created a ticket[1] asking Puppet Labs to release this as 1.0.0, so that
> each release cannot break the API as so many of us depend on this.
>
> [1] - https://tickets.puppetlabs.com/browse/PUP-2743
>
> Br,
> -g
>
> --
> Garrett Honeycutt
> @learnpuppet
> Puppet Training with LearnPuppet.com
> Mobile: +1.206.414.8658
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Puppet Users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-users/5395E97A.9050005%40garretthoneycutt.com
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-users/bde8ae76-df80-4ed1-8fb5-00de3c94b51b%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to