This is something I've been concerned about -- and how to properly approach this.
For example, we can use Puppet to ensure that the directories (mount points) exist and that the entries are present in /etc/fstab -- but I grow very concerned about automating the NFS-mount part of this. I don't think we'd want to use autofs, as the namespace isn't visible unless you "cd" directly into it. We nixed this idea with /home, for example. What would be the safest ideal way to approach this? Thanks! On Sunday, August 25, 2013 2:57:24 AM UTC-4, jcbollinger wrote: > > > On Sunday, August 25, 2013 1:54:09 AM UTC-5, jcbollinger wrote: >> >> Therefore, unless you do something to ensure your FS unmounted before the >> File is applied, the File will sometimes manage the local directory, but >> other times manage the remote one. That may be tolerable, [...] >> > > I should clarify: it probably is NOT tolerable to unmount and remount the > FS during every Puppet run, but it might be tolerable to have Puppet manage > the remote filesystem root when that is already mounted. > > > John > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
