I like it.
You could also call the class like we do with stages:
class { c: ordered => strict, stage => main }
This could influence the way block[x] -> block[y] is called.
It would make determining order and troubleshooting clearer.
Anyway, put up a feature request and I'll vote for it.
Cheers,
Den
On 05/07/2011, at 17:03, vagn scott <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 07/05/2011 01:57 AM, Peter Meier wrote:
>> Can also be:
>>
>>
> Yes, I know. Now expand this one, and maybe you will get my point.
>
> -----------------
>
> Thinking about this some more, I like block better,
> with order optional:
>
> class c {
>
> block { "x": # any order
> package { ... }
> file { "aaa": }
> exec { "bbb": }
> file { "ccc": }
> include foo
> }
> block { "y": # order matters
> $ordered => true # default is false
> file { "ddd": }
> exec { "eee": }
> include baz
> file { "fff": }
> }
> block { "z": # any order
> file { "ggg": }
> exec { "hhh": }
> file { "iii": }
> }
>
> Block[ x ] -> Block[ y ] -> Block[ z ]
>
> }
>
> meaning all in x before any in y, then y in sequence,
> before any in z
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Puppet Users" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
