> On Oct 18, 2015, at 4:37 PM, Trevor Vaughan <[email protected]> wrote: > > Reading the doc again, it seems to be (sort of) already named tk_auth::rule > or trapperkeeper_auth::rule. > > I'm OK with whatever as long as it's namespaced. > > However, given that lots of people probably have a 'puppet' namespace, you > might need another one so that you don't conflict with other people's > existing code. > > I called mine 'pupmod' since it felt like 'puppet' might be reserved at some > time in the future. >
After the comment thread in the doc last wee, top-line module is now `puppet_authorization` and the defined type to manage rules is `puppet_authorization::rule` so I think we should be clear of namespace conflicts. Eric Sorenson - [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> - freenode #puppet: eric0 puppet platform // coffee // techno // bicycles -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-dev/3FD69842-405E-4CBC-A158-1FAFFEAD8E6D%40puppetlabs.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
