I have a work in progress version of a similar change locally also. Replies inline below:
On Sunday, July 26, 2015 at 12:31:24 PM UTC-4, Gareth Rushgrove wrote: > > I'm looking at shipping a 5.0 release of the garethr/docker module to > add support for this, WIP in > https://github.com/garethr/garethr-docker/pull/311 > > And I had a few questions which I reasoned I'd ask here. > > * Previously the module defaulted to upstream docker packages for > Ubuntu, and used distro packages for everything else (because they > didn't exist). I'm proposing to change this, so everything by default > uses the upstream. And to document how you can use your distro of > choices version. Any reason why that's not the best option? > I think some people may not want that because they have internal mirrors (like we do), but it's easy to turn off the use of the public repos. > * The change in repo and the change in package-name mean a certain > level of juggling. Remove the old repo, remove the old package, add > the new, etc. I'm not sure that's best dealt with by the module, I'm > not sure I'd want updating the module to (for instance) remove docker > and every running containers on all hosts. Open to ideas about how > best to signpost this change however. > At least on Ubuntu, docker-engine conflicts with lxc-docker, so installing it automatically removes both the old generic name and the version named package. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-dev/c42e7550-20f0-4ec6-9c04-5e1495486299%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
