On 2015-12-14 13:48, Arun Raghavan wrote:
On 14 December 2015 at 17:58, David Henningsson
<[email protected]> wrote:
My understanding of all this is a bit limited, but it seems we already do
this for libpulsecommon without issue.
I'm not sure how much it is upstream and how much is packaging, but on my
Ubuntu system it looks like /usr/bin/pulseaudio (and libpulse.so) both have
a
RPATH /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/pulseaudio
...that cause us to find libpulsecomon (and presumably, libpulsecore). I
thought we weren't using RPATH, but apparently I'm mistaken.
Anyhow. If nobody else complains I don't mind this one going in. Anyone with
more knowledge who can fill in?
This one does look okay to go in from my side. afaik we do use rpath
on Linux (doesn't work with Android/bionic-based stuff, though).
Ok, pushed now.
--
David Henningsson, Canonical Ltd.
https://launchpad.net/~diwic
_______________________________________________
pulseaudio-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss
