On 2014-04-30 07:35, Thomas Martitz wrote:
Am 29.04.2014 15:22, schrieb David Henningsson:
Okay, so second iteration. The patch is no longer a draft, and numbers
look good; Peter Meerwald has confirmed my numbers of 15 - 25% less
CPU in
low latency scenarios (right)?
That said, I guess the patches could use more testing, e g corner
cases such
as what happens if either side suddenly dies, if the ringbuffer gets
full etc.
Tech overview:
The srchannel (Shared Ringbuffer Channel) is made up of two
ringbuffers in
shared memory. For signaling, we use pa_fdsem.
Hello,
I'm not in the position for technical review but...I can't help it but I
always read srcchannel and think it has to do with sources. Other
newcomers might get confused too. Perhaps a less confusing short name
can be found?
How about rbchannel (short for RingBufferChannel)?
--
David Henningsson, Canonical Ltd.
https://launchpad.net/~diwic
_______________________________________________
pulseaudio-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss
