On Wed, 02 Apr 2008 08:54:17 +0200, Jonas Sicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is definitely a good question, one that I'd like to see addressed
too.
I think that if the spec remains as is Firefox would likely fire events
that implements both the ProgressEvent interface and the LSProgressEvent
interface, but encourage people to use the ProgressEvent interface.
Possibly even by putting a message in the error console when the old
interface properties are accessed.
If we want a different interface I think the progress events specification
should be changed. XMLHttpRequest Level 2 simply uses whatever Progress
Events 1.0 defines at this point and I'd like to keep it that way.
--
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
