Hi, WebAPI fans-

The minutes for the 27 Feb 2008 DOM3 Events telcon can be found here:

 http://www.w3.org/2008/02/27-webapi-minutes.html

Or as text, below:

   [1]W3C

      [1] http://www.w3.org/

                               - DRAFT -

                       Web API WG Teleconference
                              27 Feb 2008

   [2]Agenda

      [2] http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/27_Feb_2008

   See also: [3]IRC log

      [3] http://www.w3.org/2008/02/27-webapi-irc

Attendees

   Present
          Carmelo, Andrew_Emmons, Doug, Travis

   Regrets
   Chair
          Doug

   Scribe
          Carmelo

Contents

     * [4]Topics
         1. [5]DoubleClick
         2. [6]Double Click
         3. [7]lets differ wheels to next week
         4. [8]dblclick Tests
         5. [9]'alt'-key
         6. [10]mousewheel overview
     * [11]Summary of Action Items
     _________________________________________________________



   <trackbot> Date: 27 February 2008

   <scribe> Scribe: Carmelo

   <scribe> ScribeNick:Carmelo

   <TL> Here I am.

   TL: Changes his name to Travis

   DS: We decided not to talk about Key events
   ... We need to decide how to handle keyboards and that sort of
   things
   ... Lets start with Double Click

DoubleClick

Double Click

   <aemmons>
   [12]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapi/2008Feb/0050.h
   tml

[12] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapi/2008Feb/0050.html

   AS: Two issuus Regarding Doubing Click

   DS: Can u summarize?

   AS: Should the detail value be for Double Click?
   ... Consensus is should be teh same as click
   ... Described and explained teh link above

   TL: Can an example be provid?

   R: detail for double click will be the same a the click

   <aemmons> RESOLUTION: detail for double click will be the same a the
   click

   <aemmons> RESOLUTION: We accept the current wording in the spec
   regarding what the current click count means

   <shepazu> ACTION: aemmons to add informative examples of different
   click counts for dblclick [recorded in
   [13]http://www.w3.org/2008/02/27-webapi-minutes.html#action01]

   <trackbot> Created ACTION-246 - Add informative examples of
   different click counts for dblclick [on Andrew Emmons - due
   2008-03-05].

   DS: We are finish with double Click

lets differ wheels to next week

   DS: Let's review the DoubleClick Test

   <shepazu>
   [14]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapi/2008Feb/0161.h
   tml

[14] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapi/2008Feb/0161.html

dblclick Tests

   <shepazu> test 1:
   [15]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapi/2008Feb/0161.h
   tml

[15] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapi/2008Feb/0161.html

   DS; If red shown in the test it means failure

   DS: Green usually a pass
   ... Instruction For each test

   <scribe> ACTION: Doug to provied test template [recorded in
   [16]http://www.w3.org/2008/02/27-webapi-minutes.html#action02]

   <trackbot> Created ACTION-247 - Provied test template [on Doug
   Schepers - due 2008-03-05].

   DS: Test should work on every Browser
   ... Test should figure out if person Double Click
   ... How can we actually check for that?
   ... We should make a framework for the test

   <scribe> ACTION: TL to give us a script library that will add
   listener events. [recorded in
   [17]http://www.w3.org/2008/02/27-webapi-minutes.html#action03]

   <trackbot> Created ACTION-248 - Give us a script library that will
   add listener events. [on Travis Leithead - due 2008-03-05].

   <shepazu> ACTION: Travis to provide simple abstraction layer for
   addEventListener [recorded in
   [18]http://www.w3.org/2008/02/27-webapi-minutes.html#action04]

   <trackbot> Created ACTION-249 - Provide simple abstraction layer for
   addEventListener [on Travis Leithead - due 2008-03-05].

   DS: We will build a script layer for testing

   Carmelo: How critical is add eventListener?

   DS: mmmm not sure?

   TL: addEventListener is one of the key pieces different from
   implementations
   ... Another piece that is different Scope of the event object itself

   TL; Will be happy to provide a small library to buil on

   TL: Will be happy to provide a small library to buil on

   <aemmons>
   [19]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapi/2008Feb/0164.h
   tml

[19] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapi/2008Feb/0164.html

   AE: Above link is an SVG version of the NIST test

   AS: Lets Move on

   DS: Ok

'alt'-key

   <shepazu> [20]http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/webapi/issues/122

     [20] http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/webapi/issues/122

   TL: ALT key events is sometimes loose.
   ... Explained the issue and the scenarios for "ALT" handling

   DL: propoesed two options

   sub/DL/TL/

   sub /DL/TL/

   DS: Thsi behavious is somehow address in DOM 3 events
   ... maybe this should be on next week's agenda

   DS; None of this should be dependent on any OS

   DS: We cna have a non- normative appendix for somer key sequences

   TL: That will be a good place for this (some key sequences)
   ... Was the difference of behaviour in OS's was somewhat expected?

   <scribe> ACTION: Travis to provide a simple test for modifier key
   combinations (specifically the "alt" key). [recorded in
   [21]http://www.w3.org/2008/02/27-webapi-minutes.html#action05]

   <trackbot> Created ACTION-250 - to provide a simple test for
   modifier key combinations (specifically the \"alt\" key). [on Travis
   Leithead - due 2008-03-05].

   Resolution: We will provide a model for event order and provide an
   informative appendix with major known exceptions to this model.

   DS: Next week we will talk about key event sequence models
   ... Please provide things tht we think need to be solved

   <scribe> ACTION: Doug to provide Andrew with model wording for key
   evnts sequence [recorded in
   [22]http://www.w3.org/2008/02/27-webapi-minutes.html#action06]

   <trackbot> Created ACTION-251 - Provide Andrew with model wording
   for key evnts sequence [on Doug Schepers - due 2008-03-05].

mousewheel overview

   DS: mousewheel event should be derive from mouse event .
   ... Another issue Some mousewheels let navigate on non-orthogonal
   directions.
   ... How to recognize single direction with multiple direction
   devices.

   TL: Is it possible to keep a single event aned derive the others?

   DS: Yes that is basically what omnievent is trying to accomplish.

   AS: Was happy with Travis single event idea as it simplifies context

   <shepazu> Resolution: remove multimousewheel, put additional
   dimensional delta values on mousewheel

   <Hixie> wow, after the months of telecons we spent on
   multimousewheel, we're removing it again?

   <Hixie> i'm sure glad i don't both attending telecons anymore

   <shepazu> Hixie, we're going to send a proposal to the list, we
   think we have a better model

   <Hixie> cool

   <shepazu> ACTION: Doug to send mousewheel proposal to list [recorded
   in [23]http://www.w3.org/2008/02/27-webapi-minutes.html#action07]

   <trackbot> Created ACTION-252 - Send mousewheel proposal to list [on
   Doug Schepers - due 2008-03-05].

   DS: What are useful things to test on double click?
   ... the only normative thing we can say about click count is that
   there is a click count
   ... That can be tested

   <shepazu> trackbot: adjourn

   <shepazu> trackbot, adjourn

Summary of Action Items

   [NEW] ACTION: aemmons to add informative examples of different click
   counts for dblclick [recorded in
   [24]http://www.w3.org/2008/02/27-webapi-minutes.html#action01]
   [NEW] ACTION: Doug to provide Andrew with model wording for key
   evnts sequence [recorded in
   [25]http://www.w3.org/2008/02/27-webapi-minutes.html#action06]
   [NEW] ACTION: Doug to provied test template [recorded in
   [26]http://www.w3.org/2008/02/27-webapi-minutes.html#action02]
   [NEW] ACTION: Doug to send mousewheel proposal to list [recorded in
   [27]http://www.w3.org/2008/02/27-webapi-minutes.html#action07]
   [NEW] ACTION: TL to give us a script library that will add listener
   events. [recorded in
   [28]http://www.w3.org/2008/02/27-webapi-minutes.html#action03]
   [NEW] ACTION: Travis to provide a simple test for modifier key
   combinations (specifically the "alt" key). [recorded in
   [29]http://www.w3.org/2008/02/27-webapi-minutes.html#action05]
   [NEW] ACTION: Travis to provide simple abstraction layer for
   addEventListener [recorded in
   [30]http://www.w3.org/2008/02/27-webapi-minutes.html#action04]

   [End of minutes]
     _________________________________________________________


    Minutes formatted by David Booth's [31]scribe.perl version 1.133
    ([32]CVS log)
    $Date: 2008/02/27 21:03:11 $
     _________________________________________________________

     [31] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
     [32] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/

Scribe.perl diagnostic output

   [Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.133  of Date: 2008/01/18 18:48:51
Check for newer version at [33]http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002
/scribe/

     [33] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Succeeded: s/Anne/Agenda/
Succeeded: s/Click count has to be normative/the only normative thing w
e can say about click count is that there is a click count /
Found Scribe: Carmelo
Inferring ScribeNick: Carmelo
Found ScribeNick: Carmelo
Default Present: Carmelo, Andrew_Emmons, Doug, Travis
Present: Carmelo Andrew_Emmons Doug Travis
Agenda: [34]http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/27_Feb_2008
Found Date: 27 Feb 2008
Guessing minutes URL: [35]http://www.w3.org/2008/02/27-webapi-minutes.h
tml
People with action items: aemmons doug tl travis

     [34] http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/27_Feb_2008
     [35] http://www.w3.org/2008/02/27-webapi-minutes.html

WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines.
You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.


   End of [36]scribe.perl diagnostic output]

     [36] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm


Reply via email to