Hi Maciej. Maciej Stachowiak: > The easiest way to ensure that getURL() and postURL() could be > implemented with XMLHttpRequest behind the scenses is to define them > in terms of equivalent XHR operations and normatively reference XHR > (implementations would be required to act as if it had been > implemented this way).
This may indeed be the easiest way, but I am sure there will be significant push-back on adding another normative dependency that is still in WD. > Better still would be to drop them and replace them with a requirement > to support XHR, since they provide a subset of its functionality > without significant added convenience. There is a fair amount of content out there that uses these methods, their having been introduced by ASV, so I don’t think it’s feasible to just drop them. -- Cameron McCormack, http://mcc.id.au/ xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ▪ ICQ 26955922 ▪ MSN [EMAIL PROTECTED]
