Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
If we are making the list absolute, I feel weird about including
things like 'text/xsl' and 'text/rdf' as neither of them are real
mimetypes. Is there really a lot that would break if 'text/xsl' was
not included?
No clue. I don't think it's bad to make requirements for unofficial MIME
types, since in theory no one should be using them for either XML or
non-XML, so UA requirements for them can be considered error handling.
Sure, it wouldn't be the end of the world if we did include them. But
I'd rather that we default to not do stuff like this unless it is shown
that it'll break a lot of content.
Anne: was there a reason 'text/xsl' was included other than "IE does
it"? Or is it known to actually break sites?
/ Jonas
