On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 06:54:04 +0100, Maciej Stachowiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
* - This seems unlikely in any case since they are Document methods; and
surely things like getAttribute and setAttribute exist in non-DOM code,
but thanks to the magic of object oriented programming and the fact that
such names are class-scoped this is not a big problem
Maybe not a big problem but it is still a problem because of the wonderful
"with" statement. I remember a BT.com CC number validation script break
because they did
with(document.forms[0]){
prefix='foo'; // clashes with element.prefix
}
and yesterday or so the same issue prevented form submission in Opera on a
site where someone did
with(input){
var pattern='foo'; // clashes with WebForms2 input.pattern
}
It would be nice to have the get() / getBySelector() method on Node as
well (like getElementsByTagName is) and then I'm absolutely sure we'll run
into pages that say
<script>function getAll(){ ... }</script>
<body onload="getAll() /* um, you meant YOUR function and not
body.getAll()? sorry, you're dead. */">
So a longer and more descriptive name and less web evangelism and patching
efforts :-)
--
Hallvord R. M. Steen
Core QA JavaScript tester, Opera Software
http://www.opera.com/
Opera - simply the best Internet experience
