Hi, Anne-
Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 19:14:46 +0100, Dave Massy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Looking at the feedback on
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapi/ and Anne's blog entry
at http://annevankesteren.nl/2006/12/selectors-api-naming it seems that
the majority of people would agree with these principles and the
suggested names based on getElementBySelector.
Just to make sure I understand what "majority" is I took my weblog entry
and counted the various names. +1 are those in favor of the proposal, 0
are those that didn't express any opinion and -1 are those against the
proposal. Where "proposal" is the shorter name:
Given the new information that comments on your blog are preferentially
weighted over posts to this W3C list, I've now registered my opinion
there. :)
Consider me a -1 for "shorter over more descriptive" and a -2 for
".get()" and ".getAll()" (which adroitly marries the worst of both worlds).
Regards-
-Doug
Research and Standards Engineer
6th Sense Analytics
www.6thsenseanalytics.com
mobile: 919.824.5482
