On Sun, 24 Dec 2006 16:26:51 +0100, Martijn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- It's too generic. Instead of matchAll, it could have been named getAll, collectAll, etc.
I would be fine with get() and getAll() on document (and element). I agree that they would make more sense.
- It is inconsistent with current naming. Isn't there a need/desire for the w3c to be consistent with the naming of new methods regarding older specs?
Not if the old methods effectively become obsolete. True enough, they return a live NodeList and so might be useful for some use cases but I don't think that goes for the majority if you see the usage of such methods on the web.
-- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
