> On 25 Feb 2016, at 10:56 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 1:41 PM, Dean Jackson <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 25 Feb 2016, at 8:29 AM, Robert O'Callahan <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 9:58 AM, Dean Jackson <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Although it's not just that it is a standalone property. It would be nice >>>> if you didn't have to escape out to SVG to do any fancy filter operation. >>>> Putting SVG in CSS is annoying. >>> >>> How about coming up with CSS syntax for the full feature set of SVG filters >>> in 'filter' instead of minting new properties? >> >> I think there was a proposal for a longhand form of @filter in CSS a while >> back. Once that exists again, we can define the shorthand form in the more >> detailed syntax, like what we do for the existing filter functions. > > I don't think that proposal ever advanced further than the "wouldn't > it be nice" stage. I'm happy to write it up if people are interested.
I am interested. It would make animating parts of filters more possible with CSS. And we might even be able to get some basic parameterization in there using variables. Dean
