On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 01:28:21 +0200, Tab Atkins Jr. <[email protected]>
wrote:
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 12:27 PM, Erik Dahlström <erik@dahlström.net>
wrote:
Hi,
I was reviewing the 'transform-box' section in the css transforms spec,
https://drafts.csswg.org/css-transforms/#transform-box.
The initial value of 'transform-box' is 'border-box', which is fine.
However, the spec continues to state that:
"For SVG elements without an associated CSS layout box, the used value
for
border-box is view-box."
It seems to me that a used value of 'fill-box' in this case would lead
to
more easily understood behavior than 'view-box'. So, I'd like to know
what
the rationale behind the current choice is.
An example, http://jsfiddle.net/fs6cLt38/1/.
Note that 'fill-box' isn't the correct analogue for border-box,
stroke-box is.
~TJ
True, 'stroke-box' might be an even better choice. The current draft
didn't have that keyword value listed however.
/ed
