The issues is tracked here: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26200
The bug report was not updated with the usage data of ClientRectList in Chrome stable. (Note: in Firefox ClientRectList was renamed to DOMRectList and that name made it into the spec.) Philip, do you think it is save to assume that ClientRectList (aka DOMRectList) can be replaced by a WebIDL sequence? IIRC there were some reservations in WebKit. Greetings, Dirk On Jul 2, 2015, at 12:24 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: EXPLICITLY PINGING DIRK On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Philip Jägenstedt <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 12:02 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 6:21 AM, Philip Jägenstedt <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: http://dev.w3.org/fxtf/geometry/ says "The DOMRectList interface is at-risk. The authors of this specification await feedback from implementers if the item() function of DOMRectList is currently in use on legacy interfaces. If there is no/not enough content to justify DOMRectList, legacy interfaces must use sequences instead and DOMRectList will be removed from this specification." Chrome 43 reached the stable channel about a week ago, and it had a use counter in Blink to answer this very question: https://www.chromestatus.com/metrics/feature/timeline/popularity/694 Compare that to another use counter also in the same release: https://www.chromestatus.com/metrics/feature/timeline/popularity/696 When usage rounds to zero as for ClientRectList.item(), it means that <0.0001% of page loads are affected. This is no guarantee that replacing ClientRectList with sequence<ClientRect> as the return value of Element.getClientRects() and Range.getClientRects() would be safe, but it's promising. (Dirk Schulze suggested that I notify public-fx and www-style.) Excellent news. Thanks, Philip! Is this issue being tracked somehow, do I need to do something or can I sit back and wait? Philip
