On Fri, 2003-01-03 at 01:24, Michael Fratoni wrote:
> We don't need no stinkin' GUI tools... ;)
I like that, Michael, I like that. :-)
Incidently, sorry to be following up after such a long delay. I run a
small business and I'm afraid its requirements were more than a little
compelling over the last couple of days.
> First question. You're trying to build parted from source? Something wrong
> with the included rpm?
> [mfratoni@paradox slinky]$ whichcd -v 8.0 parted
That is silly of me, isn't it? You know, I must have missed the
installed package when I searched at first. I'm hoping to use parted
with nparted, of all things, a parted "front end"! But that's a story in
itself. We still have the issue of the missing krb5-1.2.5-6 preventing
the installation of the Development Tools I'd like to get on this thing.
You'd asked about the output from 'rpm -qa | grep krb5. Here's what I
can tell you:
[root@localhost root]# rpm -qa | grep krb5
pam_krb5-1.56-1
krb5-libs-1.2.5-7
And here's the output from 'up2date -u gcc'
[root@localhost root]# up2date -u gcc
Fetching package list for channel: redhat-linux-i386-8.0...
########################################
Fetching Obsolete list for channel: redhat-linux-i386-8.0...
#########################################
Fetching rpm headers...
Testing package set / solving RPM inter-dependencies...
########################################
gcc-3.2-7.i386.rpm ########################## Done.
glibc-devel-2.2-93-5.i386.r ########################## Done.
glibc-kernheaders-2.4-7.20 ########################## Done.
binutils-2.13.90.0.2-2.i386 ########################## Done.
Preparing ########################################################
[100%]
Installing
1:gcc
2:glibc-devel
3.glibc-kernheader
4.binutils
The following packages were added to your selection to
satisfy dependencies:
Name Version Release
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
glibc-devel 2.2.93 5
glibc-kernheaders 2.4 7.20
binutils 2.13.90.0.2 2
Unless I'm missing something, we appear error free do we not? Your
comments, observations at this point?
Best regards.
John Lowell
--
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
