Agreed! I'm not too keen on this idea but have been searching for a solution to better encapsulate my code and assets. I do not consider domo the answer, but was an interesting idea. Something we are doing in prototype with the Template class does put HTML markup directly into the JS code. I am trying to mediate this though by collecting all of my template markup in a separate JS namespaced object. This is helping a lot. And if you don't mind inline style markup in the result, you can do the same thing, keep all of your style together in a separate JS object.
Karl.. On Tuesday, November 20, 2012 2:53:18 AM UTC-7, Victor wrote: > > Domo > >> http://domo-js.com/ > > > From the J2EE developer's point of view it looks like return back to > 2000s, to Servlets and tons of HTML/CSS markup in code. IMHO all advanced > Java developers agree that moving HTML markup from Java code into separate > JSP files was great step forward. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prototype & script.aculo.us" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/prototype-scriptaculous/-/vCndJz-CfJAJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
