Hi, > Hey, what stops me from this:
Nothing at all (since `Array#sort` operates on the array in place, but does return the array reference as a return value as well). Well, nothing other than the missing "e" on `reverse`. ;-) Note that if you do that, `list` will be an `Array`, regardless of what it was at the outset. If it's *already* an array, I'd ditch `sortBy` and use `sort`. Out of curiousity, what's in `list`? All those calls to `Object.values` look like a lot of overhead... -- T.J. On May 9, 9:54 am, kstubs <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey, what stops me from this: > > list = list.sortBy(function(s) { > if(field.field.startsWith('EventScore') || field.field == > 'AAScore') > return Number(Object.values(s)[index]); > else > return Object.values(s)[index]; > }).*revers()*; -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prototype & script.aculo.us" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
