Aha, I just read further, and it appears this won't work for what I'm
doing, which is in part creating a valid XHTML branch to build epub
documents, PrinceXML PDF documents, etc. from. I could certainly strip
these out when building those iterations, but I guess I'll keep
looking and see if I can figure out another way to go.
Walter
On Apr 28, 2011, at 5:15 AM, T.J. Crowder wrote:
It isn't, strictly speaking *valid* because (for instance) you can't
have a `script` element that's an immediate child of a `ul`. But
firstly, that seems like an error in the spec (why not?), and
secondly, the browsers don't seem to mind.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prototype
& script.aculo.us" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
