That was a typo on my part with respect to the class/id thing in my
example. I tried it a couple of different ways, using long-hand CSS
definitions as well as shorthand, too. I will try with the shipping
versiont and let you know if it works there.

Walter

On Mar 20, 12:59 pm, "T.J. Crowder" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The CSS you've quoted is defining a rule for elements with *class*
> "foo", not `id` foo, and your quoted test code is using `getHeight`,
> not `getWidth`.
>
> If I make the rule for the `id` "foo" and use `getWidth` and Prototype
> 1.7.0.0, it works for me on Safari 5, IE6, IE7, and IE9 on Windows;
> and Chrome (let's see, what is it today) 10, Firefox 3.6, and Opera 11
> on Linux:http://jsbin.com/uhofu4
>
> So either it's a "feature" of RC2, or something that only shows up on
> a Mac (if that's where you're using Safari), or maybe a couple of the
> issues with the quoted test code are actually present in the code
> you're testing. Or something else. :-)
>
> HTH,
> --
> T.J. Crowder
> Independent Software Engineer
> tj / crowder software / com
> www / crowder software / com
>
> On Mar 20, 4:24 pm, Walter Lee Davis <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > I'm using 1.7 rc2 (don't have access to a later version at the moment)
> > and it seems like getWidth is only counting the width, and not
> > including the border width. The documentation hints that it should
> > return the width of the element's layout box.
>
> > .foo {
> >     border: 1px solid black;
> >     width: 498px;}
>
> > <div id="foo">bar</div>
>
> > $('foo').getHeight() --> 498 in Safari 5.latest
>
> > I think it should be 500. Is this just a factor of the version I'm
> > using, or is it how it's supposed to work?
>
> > Walter

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.

Reply via email to