I agree and would like to see Prototype start returning to the forefront as the powerful JS library it is
On Mar 14, 10:53 am, Walter Lee Davis <[email protected]> wrote: > Sorry for the rant, but I came to Prototype by way of early > exploration with Rails. I found Prototype approachable and learn-able > in a way that I didn't (and don't) find jQuery to be. > > I've invested years in learning Prototype and it has trained and > patterned my JavaScript brain. I'm quite cheesed about the notion of > having to learn another way to look at JavaScript. > > At the same time, I can't help but notice the <crickets> around here > lately. When I joined this list (back in the rails-spinoff days) there > were dozens of posts per day, now we're lucky to get there in a week. > > What the heck is going on here? > > Walter -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prototype & script.aculo.us" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
