Not in my memory of HTML, which begins in 1997. It's certainly possible to put that into a browser and see something. Browsers are designed to ignore or coerce invalid code as best they can, to preserve the intent where possible. But there's a mile of difference between the JavaScript DOM interpreter and the browser's HTML display engine.

JavaScript doesn't even receive the HTML as written in code from the browser when it's constructing its starting DOM tree, it uses the output of the browser's first pass at munging the input code stream into shape. This is why you can see a big difference between Firebug and view source, for example.

So whenever you are interacting directly with the DOM, as you do in Prototype Element#update or anything else that inserts elements into the DOM, you are relied on to insert something that makes sense in the context where it will be added. If you don't, you get an error or you get ignored.

One other example of this, directly related to tables: It's perfectly valid code to write <table id="foo"><tr><td>Something</td></tr></ table>, but it's more correct to write <table id="foo"><tbody><tr><td>Something</td></tr></tbody></table>. Most browsers will silently add that missing intermediate element when the page loads.

So if you wanted to get a handle on your first row, and you used $ ('foo').childElements()[0] (totally made-up example) then you might actually get a reference to the tbody -- the element you didn't actually code!

Now you're probably smarter than that, and you'd write $ ('foo').down('tr') and get what you wanted, but that's just an example to make the point that the code you wrote isn't even guaranteed to be the code you're going to be talking to when you start messing with the DOM.

Walter

On Feb 16, 2011, at 10:15 AM, Jeffrey Lee wrote:

Shows how outdated my HTML is. Thanks for the pointer. Its funny, when I was googling around apparently once upon a time it was at least tolerated, if not officially acceptable, to have <div> as a child of table.
___________________________
Jeffrey Lee
http://www.jeffreyalanlee.com
[email protected]




On Feb 15, 2011, at 23:20 , T.J. Crowder wrote:

Hi,

That HTML is invalid. You can't have a `div` as a child of `table`:
http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/tabular-data.html#the-table-element

If you want to subdivide a table like that, you probably want `thead`
(for your headers) and one or more `tbody` elements:

<table>
<thead>
  <tr>
    <th>Item</th>
     <th>Transaction Type</th>
     <th>Quantity</th>
    <th>Amount</th>
     <th>Transaction comments</th>
  </tr>
</thead>
<tbody id = "transList">
  <tr>
    <<bunch of table data>>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <<bunch of table data>>
  </tr><tr>
     <<bunch of table data>>
  </tr>
</tbody>
</table>

...and then your update will have to be valid `tbody` content (e.g.,
rows).

Example:
http://jsbin.com/evuxe3

HTH,
--
T.J. Crowder
Independent Software Engineer
tj / crowder software / com
www / crowder software / com

On Feb 15, 10:59 pm, Jeff <[email protected]> wrote:
This is a rails generated webpage. I've created a table definition as
follows:

<table>
 <tr>
   <th>Item</th>
   <th>Transaction Type</th>
   <th>Quantity</th>
   <th>Amount</th>
   <th>Transaction comments</th>
 </tr>

<div id = "transList">
<tr>
  <<bunch of table data>>
 </tr><tr>
  <<bunch of table data>>
 </tr><tr>
   <<bunch of table data>>
 </tr>
</div>
</table>

If I execute a $('transList').update('Test') or frankly any other text
or html, the existing table data remains, and the updated text is
placed above the entire table.  However, if I do a view - >source,
this new data doesn't show up in the page source at all, only the old
table data.

I'm having this problem in both Safari and Firefox. Any suggestions?

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prototype & script.aculo.us" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] . To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en .


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prototype & script.aculo.us" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] . To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en .


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prototype 
& script.aculo.us" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.

Reply via email to