Well, one can not give up! Prototypes are quite mature and a good library should only create as Microsoft sites such miniprojects here and the whole community to develop them, and we will long stand in the place!
On 5 окт, 19:54, "T.J. Crowder" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Well, Prototype's had templates for > years:http://api.prototypejs.org/language/template/ > > It's true, though, jQuery is seeing a lot of investment and interest. > These three Microsoft plugins themselves aren't all that much to write > home about (though the globalization is exciting), but the _fact_ of > them coming on the heels of Microsoft's recently re-upping their > commitment to jQuery is significant. > -- > T.J. Crowder > Independent Software Engineer > tj / crowder software / com > www / crowder software / com > > On Oct 5, 3:52 pm, buda <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > jQuery is developing very quickly. Unfortunately it must be noted that > > this development forced to move to jQuery although I prefer the > > prototype. > > > On 5 окт, 17:14, buda <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2010/10/04/jquery-templates-da... > > > > This is very useful - this must be in prototype too! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prototype & script.aculo.us" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
