I've been thinking about this... kinda nagging at me in the back of my mind...
Why not use AJAX to make a SOAP call? The SOAP call would make the call to the fbapi completely transparent. One article here: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/webservices/library/ws-wsajax/ On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 6:51 AM, ColinFine <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Sep 15, 1:54 am, Ed Fullman <[email protected]> wrote: > > The file fbsidebar.html is a standard Facebook plugin as follows. > > I need fbsidebar.html to run on the server, and return only the rendered > > code. In this (current) configuration, the Ajax.updater in Index.html > will > > return a bunch of iframes and javascript that make subsequent calls in > the > > browser to Facebook domains encountering corporate firewalls. > > AFAICS fbsidebar.html is HTML with Javascript embedded. > > I don't think you can run Javascript on the server without a SSJS > system on the server: I've never heard of running it server-side in an > HTML page like a PHP program. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Prototype & script.aculo.us" group. > To post to this group, send email to > [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<prototype-scriptaculous%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prototype & script.aculo.us" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
