Did you read the migration doc?

https://github.com/prometheus/snmp_exporter/blob/main/auth-split-migration.md

On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 5:10 PM Nicholas Smith <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Actually struggling with this myself since the change to auth split
> migration in v0.23.0
>
> I cant seem to work out how to format my generator.yml file that is
> currently work for v0.22.0 to work in v0.23.0 and above
>
> This is my current generator.yml
>
> modules: # Dell Idrac idrac: version: 3 timeout: 20s retries: 10
> max_repetitions: 10 auth: username: "${snmp_user}" password:
> "${snmp_password}" auth_protocol: SHA priv_protocol: AES security_level:
> authPriv priv_password: "${snmp_privpass}" community: "${snmp_community}"
> walk: - statusGroup - chassisInformationTable - systemBIOSTable -
> firmwareTableEntry - intrusionTableEntry - physicalDiskTable - batteryTable
> - controllerTable - virtualDiskTable - systemStateTable - powerSupplyTable
> - powerUsageTable - powerSupplyTable - voltageProbeTable -
> amperageProbeTable - systemBatteryTable - networkDeviceTable - thermalGroup
> - interfaces - systemInfoGroup - 1.3.6.1.2.1.1 - eventLogTable overrides:
> systemModelName: type: DisplayString systemServiceTag: type: DisplayString
> systemOSVersion: type: DisplayString systemOSName: type: DisplayString
> systemBIOSVersionName: type: DisplayString firmwareVersionName: type:
> DisplayString eventLogRecord: type: DisplayString eventLogDateName: type:
> DisplayString networkDeviceProductName: type: DisplayString
> networkDeviceVendorName: type: DisplayString networkDeviceFQDD: type:
> DisplayString networkDeviceCurrentMACAddress: type: PhysAddress48
> fortigate: version: 3 timeout: 20s retries: 10 max_repetitions: 10 auth:
> username: "${snmp_user}" password: "${snmp_password}" auth_protocol: SHA
> priv_protocol: AES security_level: authPriv priv_password:
> "${snmp_privpass}" community: "${snmp_community}" walk: - system -
> interfaces - ip - ifXTable - fgModel - fgVirtualDomain - fgSystem -
> fgFirewall - fgMgmt - fgIntf - fgAntivirus - fgApplications - fgVpn - fgIps
> - fnCoreMib
>
>
>
> On Wednesday 10 January 2024 at 12:55:45 pm UTC+1 Brian Candler wrote:
>
>> That's interesting, thanks! AES192C and AES256C are clearly present in
>> the code
>> <https://github.com/prometheus/snmp_exporter/blob/v0.25.0/config/config.go#L152-L165>,
>> but the documentation in generator/README.md omits to mention them.
>>
>> From gosnmp's source (v3_usm.go):
>>
>> // Changed: AES192, AES256, AES192C, AES256C added
>> const (
>>         NoPriv  SnmpV3PrivProtocol = 1
>>         DES     SnmpV3PrivProtocol = 2
>>         AES     SnmpV3PrivProtocol = 3
>>         AES192  SnmpV3PrivProtocol = 4 // Blumenthal-AES192
>>         AES256  SnmpV3PrivProtocol = 5 // Blumenthal-AES256
>>         AES192C SnmpV3PrivProtocol = 6 // Reeder-AES192
>>         AES256C SnmpV3PrivProtocol = 7 // Reeder-AES256
>> )
>>
>> Some background here:
>>
>> https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-management/snmpv3-aes192-256-key-localization-not-done-via-aes-draft/td-p/2954763
>>
>> https://github.com/markabrahams/node-net-snmp/issues/154#issuecomment-757456861
>>
>> Personally, I'd suggest using the more standard AES(128) instead. I note
>> that in its implementation of TLS versions <1.3, Go prefers AES over
>> AES256
>> <https://github.com/golang/go/blob/go1.21.6/src/crypto/tls/cipher_suites.go#L260-L265>
>>  when
>> negotiating ciphers:
>>
>> //   - AES-128 comes before AES-256
>> //
>> //     The only potential advantages of AES-256 are better multi-target
>> //     margins, and hypothetical post-quantum properties. Neither apply to
>> //     TLS, and AES-256 is slower due to its four extra rounds (which
>> don't
>> //     contribute to the advantages above).
>>
>> On Wednesday 10 January 2024 at 11:40:57 UTC Alexander Wilke wrote:
>>
>>> If you use Cisco devices then you have to use a "C" at the end of the
>>> privacy protocol because it seems Cisco has specific impelementation.
>>>
>>> I use
>>>
>>> *priv_protocol: AES256C*
>>>
>>> for Cisco IOS and IOS XE devices running 17.x.y version.
>>>
>>>
>>> Brian Candler schrieb am Mittwoch, 10. Januar 2024 um 12:32:08 UTC+1:
>>>
>>>> > Please list the SNMP V3 instance configuration in generator.yml. I
>>>> want to know where the configuration error is!
>>>>
>>>> It's in the documentation:
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/prometheus/snmp_exporter/blob/main/generator/README.md#file-format
>>>>
>>>> However, you don't need to compile anything to get started. Just use
>>>> the supplied snmp.yml, and edit the section under "auths" so it looks like
>>>> this:
>>>>
>>>> auths:
>>>>   public_v1:
>>>>     community: public
>>>>     security_level: noAuthNoPriv
>>>>     auth_protocol: MD5
>>>>     priv_protocol: DES
>>>>     version: 1
>>>>   public_v2:
>>>>     community: public
>>>>     security_level: noAuthNoPriv
>>>>     auth_protocol: MD5
>>>>     priv_protocol: DES
>>>>     version: 2
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *  prod_v3:    version: 3    security_level: authPriv    username:
>>>> admin    auth_protocol: SHA    password: XXXXXXX    priv_protocol: AES
>>>> priv_password: YYYYYYY*
>>>>
>>>> And you're done.
>>>>
>>>> The next simplest option is to load multiple config files. This means
>>>> you can use the existing snmp.yml completely unchanged, and a separate yml
>>>> file that has just your auth(s) in it.  I use the following:
>>>>
>>>> *snmp_exporter --config.file=/etc/prometheus/snmp.d/*.yml*
>>>>
>>>> Then I have /etc/prometheus/snmp.d/auth.yml (which is mine)
>>>> and /etc/prometheus/snmp.d/snmp.yml (which is the standard one).
>>>>
>>>> You only need to use the generator if you want to scrape MIBs other
>>>> than the supplied example ones. You can do this by starting with the
>>>> supplied generator.yml
>>>> <https://github.com/prometheus/snmp_exporter/blob/main/generator/generator.yml>
>>>> and modifying it. But if all you want to do is change the auths, I wouldn't
>>>> bother, since the generator essentially just copies the auths from its
>>>> input to its output.
>>>>
>>>> On Wednesday 10 January 2024 at 10:36:09 UTC Awemnhd wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I tried using snmp_exporter-0.25.0, using SNMP v3 mode, SHA and AES
>>>>> still not successful, and I have to recompile the generator.yml file,
>>>>> otherwise using the default snmp.yml file will have no effect!
>>>>>
>>>>> Please list the SNMP V3 instance configuration in generator.yml. I
>>>>> want to know where the configuration error is!
>>>>>
>>>>> 在2024年1月9日星期二 UTC+8 22:54:36<Brian Candler> 写道:
>>>>>
>>>>>> > Why is SNMP v3 so difficult to implement?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's not. It's dead easy. Do you have a working snmpwalk command line
>>>>>> which talks to your device? Then you just transfer the settings to your
>>>>>> snmp_exporter configuration.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This has been made easier since snmp_exporter v0.23.0
>>>>>> <https://github.com/prometheus/snmp_exporter/releases/tag/v0.23.0>,
>>>>>> because the "modules" which define the OID walking and the "auths" which
>>>>>> provide the credentials have been made orthogonal. You can add new auths,
>>>>>> without touching modules. You can also put them in separate files.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So you end up with e.g.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> auths:
>>>>>>   prod_v3:
>>>>>>     version: 3
>>>>>>     security_level: authPriv
>>>>>>     username: admin
>>>>>>     auth_protocol: SHA
>>>>>>     password: XXXXXXX
>>>>>>     priv_protocol: AES
>>>>>>     priv_password: YYYYYYY
>>>>>>
>>>>>> then you call /snmp?target=x.x.x.x&module=if_mib&auth=prod_v3
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The default is indeed still public_v2. The only other option would be
>>>>>> to have no default, i.e. snmp_exporter would fail unless you provide an
>>>>>> explicit set of credentials.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hence I'd definitely recommend moving to snmp_exporter 0.25.0. If you
>>>>>> can't do that, then there is a YAML trick you can do to make adding new
>>>>>> auths easier:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> modules:
>>>>>>   if_mib: *&if_mib*
>>>>>>   .... etc
>>>>>>
>>>>>> # Append to end of file
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *if_mib_prod_v3:  <<: *if_mib*
>>>>>>   version: 3
>>>>>>   timeout: 3s
>>>>>>   retries: 3
>>>>>>   auth:
>>>>>>     security_level: authPriv
>>>>>>     username: admin
>>>>>>     auth_protocol: SHA
>>>>>>     password: XXXXXXXX
>>>>>>     ... etc
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This effectively "clones" the if_mib module under a new module
>>>>>> "if_mib_prod_v3", and then overrides parts of it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tuesday 9 January 2024 at 10:04:57 UTC Awemnhd wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> see
>>>>>>> https://github.com/prometheus/snmp_exporter/tree/main/generator#file-format
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Tried various ways to achieve some parameter passing
>>>>>>> username:
>>>>>>> security_level:
>>>>>>> password: SHA
>>>>>>> auth_protocol: AES
>>>>>>> priv_protocol:
>>>>>>> priv_password:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As a result, when the service is started, the default access method
>>>>>>> is community: public_v2!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Why is SNMP v3 so difficult to implement? Why are they all in SNMP
>>>>>>> V2 mode? Why?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Prometheus Users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prometheus-users/b986f278-12ca-4b10-98e7-56ccd7805dc3n%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prometheus-users/b986f278-12ca-4b10-98e7-56ccd7805dc3n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Prometheus Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prometheus-users/CABbyFmpt7-%3DNH3Rq2WJz03y2DCCK6vxmqCbG4eX%2BvKAeMfQZig%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to