On 19.04.24 01:33, John Yu wrote: > I'm thinking, why can't we deploy an additional prom as an agent to receive > data, and then write to the core prom remotely after receiving the data? > Although I know that this will lead to breaking away from the pull model to > a certain extent, it is undeniable that we do have push scenarios in > metrics monitoring. Having it seems to be a better solution to push > scenarios. At least in my opinion, increasing ttl will be better than pgw. > better?
Remote-writing into a vanilla Prometheus server has its own set of problems, but it's safe to say that it's less of an abuse then using the Pushgateway to turn Prometheus into a push-based metrics collection system. -- Björn Rabenstein [PGP-ID] 0x851C3DA17D748D03 [email] [email protected] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prometheus Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prometheus-developers/ZiJ6hfikXX4Jpss0%40mail.rabenste.in.
