On 05.10.23 17:48, Clément Jean wrote: > I'm not entirely sure yet because I'm new to contributing to prometheus. If > there is any use cases that you guys already discussed around Protobuf, I'd > be happy to help.
If you are really deep into protobuf, there is definitely one big and fat issue to solve: We are still using gogo-protobuf in prometheus/prometheus, which has good performance properties, but is unmaintained. The plan has been for a while to migrate to another protobuf implementation that performs similarly well. Here is the discussion on this mailing list: https://groups.google.com/g/prometheus-developers/c/uFWRyqZaQis/m/1OOGT7s5AwAJ And here is a branch that contains a PoC of migrating to the vitess protoc plugin: https://github.com/austince/prometheus/tree/feat/drop-gogo (Note that it is more than two years old, and I'm not sure if the vitess plugin performs well enough. But it could be a starting point.) -- Björn Rabenstein [PGP-ID] 0x851C3DA17D748D03 [email] [email protected] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prometheus Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prometheus-developers/ZS/SqHfCPP9Cag2m%40mail.rabenste.in.
