On 12.07.23 10:10, E wrote: > I think optional TTL per time series is a good idea. It might have several > use cases, it doesn't break anything, and it shouldn't be too hard to make. > So why not?
Because all the use cases discussed so far have turned out to be anti-patterns we don't want to support. This topic was brought up multiple times at dev-summits etc., and the outcome was always the same. > I might have used this feature to trigger short-lived alerts with arbitrary > text in a label, something I wouldn't do without TTL because it would > require a cleanup. I don't quite understand that use case, but feel free to flesh it out a bit more and propose it as a topic for the dev-summit by adding it to the agenda: https://docs.google.com/document/d/11LC3wJcVk00l8w5P3oLQ-m3Y37iom6INAMEu2ZAGIIE/edit?pli=1 -- Björn Rabenstein [PGP-ID] 0x851C3DA17D748D03 [email] [email protected] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prometheus Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prometheus-developers/ZK6TOzCck1MSMuW0%40mail.rabenste.in.
