On 2023-03-27 13:22, Abdelouahab Khelifati wrote:
Hello Stuart, thanks for reaching out!

I see your point!

My data does contain only numerical data, has a constant rate, and
only has one string label. Would you say that it is possible but not
optimal or simply not possible to use Prometheus as a general-purpose
database?

Also, would it be possible to point out the main technical factors
rendering Prometheus unsuitable as a general-purpose database?


Well the TDSB in Promethues could be used elsewhere if you created code (as I think the TDSB code is fairly abstracted from other parts of Prometheus) but otherwise all interactions are via the rest of Prometheus. So for example the main way of populating the database is via scraping targets. There is no way to change existing data (other than deleting things). There is only a single schema (each timeseries contains a single float64 per data point with a list of string based labels [the metric name is actually a label]).

So I'd suggest that the TDSB is as it stands very much not a general-purpose database - it is just a integral part of Promtheus, designed for the use case of regular live numeric metric values, with the ability to extract values via PromQL for graphing/alerts/etc. If your use case aligns with that, then it could be a good fit, but if you are wanting other things (being able to change values, doing a lot of bulk importing, wanting to run/scale the database separately, wanting database reliability/HA similar to other general purpose databases) it may be a poor fit.

--
Stuart Clark

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Prometheus Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prometheus-developers/ed047ce5d0348a46c8215c6eb9201302%40Jahingo.com.

Reply via email to