On 06.12.22 23:05, Julien Pivotto wrote: > > I had two things in mind when calling the actual move to a vote: > > 1. I considered that the Windows exporter had a large community of users > and that taking the decision in public would be good for the community. > Some people might object for various reasons, so it made sense to me > to do it in public. > 2. I felt that the one week delay would serve us best than the few days > that lazy consensus allows. This gives a proper date to end the vote > and people who want to react know that there is a deadline. I don't > expect us to reach 1/2 of the Prometheus team voting within a week, > because it's not a majority vote. I wanted this to be time-framed > somehow.
I would claim that both can be achieved by mailing this list (prometheus-developers@) with the proposal, stating that feedback is welcome, and that lazy consensus is assumed if there are no objections within a week. In any case, thanks for sharing your reasoning. It helps me to understand the context. And maybe I'm just traumatized from the past when we had to use votes frequently because consensus was impossible to reach. -- Björn Rabenstein [PGP-ID] 0x851C3DA17D748D03 [email] [email protected] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prometheus Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prometheus-developers/Y4/ZJmby9WP5Q0WH%40mail.rabenste.in.
