Yes :) What would be the best approach to see adoption and letting the community collectively know/try?
Thanks, Rudford On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 3:16 PM Bjoern Rabenstein <[email protected]> wrote: > On 01.06.22 11:28, Rudford Hamon wrote: > > > > For example, OpenZiti has a tunneler embedded with zero trust that > > can be used to connect (upstream or downstream) with a few lines of > > code. Super flexible and doesn't require any changes to your > > binaries. Also, as you mentioned, this will give the Prometheus > > family "end-users" an option to use whatever they feel is best for > > them. At least with the OpenZiti tunneler, the connection will be > > free with layer 7 security on the back-end. Once the Prometheus > > community becomes more familiar with embedded zero trust, the family > > may consider embedding zero trust at the application level so the > > project can scrape anything from anywhere without any exposers for > > both, Prometheus and end-users. > > That sounds good. In that way, we can see what the adoption is without > requiring any changes on the Prometheus side. > > -- > Björn Rabenstein > [PGP-ID] 0x851C3DA17D748D03 > [email] [email protected] > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prometheus Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prometheus-developers/CAHFosDQHY8oGbTioAZYbnJ0aYFN8tZJ03abMW%2BWGZz6qSJfZzQ%40mail.gmail.com.
