We should graveyard it. If you are concerned about redirecting people to the fork, we should transfer the ownership of the repo.
Le mer. 18 août 2021 à 11:55, Bjoern Rabenstein <[email protected]> a écrit : > On 17.08.21 10:54, Matthias Rampke wrote: > > I think the no-magic route is better. You can also archive the repo[0] to > > make it clear that it's read only (with this GitHub feature, do we still > > need to graveyard anything ourselves? > > That's a good idea. I'll do just that. > > In general, I think it still makes sense to graveyard repos if we want > to reduce visibility, e.g. because continue using the code would be > harmful, but in this case, where you could still use the old code but > should go for the fork for new features etc., archiving seems > precisely the right thing to do. > > -- > Björn Rabenstein > [PGP-ID] 0x851C3DA17D748D03 > [email] [email protected] > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Prometheus Developers" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prometheus-developers/20210818095542.GS3669%40jahnn > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prometheus Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prometheus-developers/CAFJ6V0q7hxn064U074mVS-J4FHv5uFqOz4E-Y5c7OhQ96bd5sA%40mail.gmail.com.
