For a start, I filled out dummy answers (without submitting) to get to see all the subsequent pages of the application form. You can see all the questions they ask here:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/123fdfSGk5_tjdXAE0G1CeVcIpMBy9JBthwG0lwYjMXc/edit?usp=sharing I could fill it out to the best of my ability, but want to give people a chance to see the questions in case they have opinions on some of them. On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 11:33 AM Ben Kochie <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, we should apply and get more details on the new FOSS plans. > > Anyone volunteer to take that on? > > On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 10:59 AM Julius Volz <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 10:16 AM Johannes Ziemke <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi everyone, >>> >>> as mentioned in chat yesterday, Docker will limit the number of layers a >>> user can pull within 6 hours: >>> >>> >>> https://www.docker.com/blog/scaling-docker-to-serve-millions-more-developers-network-egress >>> >>> This will certainly cause problems for people pulling our images from >>> the Docker Hub. Especially in Kubernetes scenarios where >>> ImagePullPolicy=Always is common practice and often even enforced by >>> running the AlwaysPullImages admission controller. This will likely lead to >>> outages in dynamic environments (autoscaling, spot instances etc). I'd >>> expect especially the node-exporter to be affected since it's probably the >>> thing people run the most instances of in their infrastructure. >>> >>> There is not much we can do. We could beg Docker to void the limits for >>> us >>> >> >> I mean as the article states "Finally, as part of Docker’s commitment to >> the open source community, before November 1 we will be announcing >> availability of new open source plans. To apply for an open source plan, >> please complete the short form here.". >> >> I wonder when exactly "before November 1" will be and how much time that >> will give us to decide things. In case their OSS plans allow unlimited >> pulls again, then we should be fine? >> >> But also fine switching to quay.io everywhere. But the general problem >> is services that are expensive to run, but offered for free... wondering if >> something similar will happen to quay.io at some point. But now that it >> belongs to Red Hat, err, IBM, they might be big enough to not care about >> the costs it produces. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Prometheus Developers" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prometheus-developers/CA%2BT6Yoy6qBfYQdEyidbs3MsAbvnKJZ6bDDr54Ha_rFLi%3DYP4ZQ%40mail.gmail.com >> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prometheus-developers/CA%2BT6Yoy6qBfYQdEyidbs3MsAbvnKJZ6bDDr54Ha_rFLi%3DYP4ZQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >> . >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prometheus Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prometheus-developers/CA%2BT6YoyqdwOFRY5qgbzsVzb3idp8xw8UbnP8T734mXpycNytbQ%40mail.gmail.com.
