> If at any point Gitpod stops working / we don't like it anymore, we can
> just remove it.
>

Absolutely! Also please ping me or someone from Gitpod if you have issues
or any kind of useful feedback.


> I don't think we would ever hit the 50h limit, and even then that's
> probably negotiable.
>

We offer a free unlimited hours plan for professional open source
developers, which you can request once you hit the 50h/month limit.


>
> On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 6:19 PM Julien Pivotto <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> While getting new contributors is fundamental for any open source
>> projects, I would be on the side to explore other possibilities than this
>> one. Let me explain my concerns.
>>
>> First of all, that is an extra tool. I am not a fan on adding extra tools
>> on top of GitHub, like gerrithub or other review platforms. Especially
>> tools that would not be used by us as a team.
>>
>> When we redirect our users to a third party platform, we are 'endorsing'
>> then in some way. I have not investigated the specifics of the proposed
>> platforms, but we would have to review the tos of that platform and look if
>> that is in line with our expectations.
>>
>> We have got in the past first time contributors starting features,
>> implementations, and then vanish before the code is in a mergeable state.
>> We should find a compromise so that such a platform to embark more people
>> does not lead us in that direction more often.
>>
>> I also note that the scope is unclear. Is that for the react app? For
>> TSDB? It would be strange to have a solution that would only work for one
>> of them, e.g. react, because otherwise if someone comes with a solution for
>> TSDB, we would end up with two solutions.
>>
>> I do note that the open source version is limited to 50h/month; and that
>> the application itself has < 1000 users according to GitHub.
>>
>> Le dim. 26 juil. 2020 à 14:42, Julius Volz <[email protected]> a
>> écrit :
>>
>>> +CC Sven from Gitpod
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 2:40 PM Julius Volz <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I got to know the people from Gitpod.io (https://www.gitpod.io/), and
>>>> when I learned about their capability to not only use Gitpod as a regular
>>>> online web-based dev environment, but to create ad-hoc environments based
>>>> off PR branches as CI checks, I thought it would be a really neat thing to
>>>> have that for Prometheus (it's free for OSS). It would also be generally
>>>> great to give people a web-based container that has Prometheus pre-built
>>>> and the dev environment ready and setup for working on the code. A proposed
>>>> PR for the latter is here (AFAIK this doesn't do the CI integration yet,
>>>> but that would be great too, then you can explore with the binary + code at
>>>> a PR branch online, without checking it out locally):
>>>> https://github.com/prometheus/prometheus/pull/7673
>>>>
>>>> What do people think?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Julius
>>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Prometheus Developers" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prometheus-developers/CA%2BT6YoygV%3Dz3hDjb06DeK8E9ikT7RRe5tswnvvw_d%2Bv%2BOfnh2w%40mail.gmail.com
>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prometheus-developers/CA%2BT6YoygV%3Dz3hDjb06DeK8E9ikT7RRe5tswnvvw_d%2Bv%2BOfnh2w%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Prometheus Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prometheus-developers/CAEzbUNV%2B0jbn%3Dnvm31HFfKiS7MUafEgqsgqSwLuTJS7hnw7G-Q%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to