Hi Even,
Furthermore, we see a precedents in existing projections of Proj that are
substrates of DGGS - such as HEALPix.
Don’t get me wrong - I’m not averse to including DGGAL as an additional library
- but Project has an edge for integration purposes, and especially for PostGIS,
etc.
If my project was a DGGS without a supporting CRS - then I would not be looking
to Proj.
Best regards
Ben.
> On 22 Mar 2026, at 16:47, Even Rouault <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Ben,
> I don't think PROJ API is the best fit for DGGS implementations. Probably
> https://github.com/ecere/dggal would be a better host (I haven't used it
> myself)
> And AFAIK, WKT / ISO-19111 hasn't been designed with DGGS use cases in mind
> either.
>
> Even
_______________________________________________
PROJ mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/proj
