I have spent a few minutes trying very hard to disagree with the contents of the GDAL AI tool policy. Unfortunately (and much to my regret 🙂), I did not find a single word, letter, whitespace character, or punctuation mark worth disagreeing with.
I would, however, suggest modifying Even's suggestion of "s/GDAL/PROJ/" to the only slightly more verbose "s/GDAL/PROJ/g" 🙂 /Thomas Den tors. 12. mar. 2026 kl. 17.38 skrev Even Rouault via PROJ < [email protected]>: > (resending due to yesterday's OSGeo server maintenance) > > -------- Message transféré -------- > Sujet : LLM/AI tool policy > Date : Wed, 11 Mar 2026 23:03:39 +0100 > De : Even Rouault <[email protected]> > <[email protected]> > Pour : proj <[email protected]> <[email protected]> > > Folks, > > after GDAL and QGIS, I strongly suspect we also now receive LLM driven > contributions. What about adopting > https://gdal.org/en/stable/community/ai_tool_policy.html with s/GDAL/PROJ > ? > > Even > > -- http://www.spatialys.com > My software is free, but my time generally not. > > > _______________________________________________ > PROJ mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/proj >
_______________________________________________ PROJ mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/proj
