[email protected] wrote on 2016-01-25: > On 2016-01-25 17:18, Tracy Pearson wrote: > Mike, > > I don't foresee a problem with the 256. It's more trouble than it is > worth, > and takes longer to crack. Currently > > From what I picked up from some of the reading I did today. Microsoft > made > this announcement back in 2014. I suspect we will have several years > to go. > > > > Comodo should really stop selling the SHA-1 and SHA-2 if they're > problematic in today's computing world. >
Mike, The SHA-2 is the current standard. Windows XP and Vista probably won't be able to use the SHA-2 to verify the certificate. I started a new thread that has a link which shows how to dual sign with both SHA-1 and SHA-2 (which is also known as SHA-256). This will help with verifying on multiple OS's and still only ship 1 EXE. Tracy Pearson PowerChurch Software _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
