Dan:

Email clients are notoriously bad about formatting; email was intended for
plain old ASCII 7-bit and most everything after that only works sometimes.
>From viewing the original source, it looks like you are using Outlook.com
which is relaying through Hotmail. I don't have an account there to
compare, but I'd suggest (especially seeing the 'multipart/alternative' and
'text/html' at the end of the message) that you should dig around and see
if you can find an option to send 'plain text' or the equivalent. I know
when I've used Thunderbird, I've been able to  configure that on a
client-by-client basis, and it works really well for mailing lists.

Otherwise, you might want to style the html you're writing with PRE tags
and see if that translates better.

Or double-spacing, I've seen work with some clients.

Good luck.

On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Dan Covill <[email protected]> wrote:

> The following code comes thru fine when I send it to myself.Let's see if
> going thru ProFox changes things.
> Test formatting with 'Reply' direct:for I = 1 to 15   do MyProc with 'x'
>  .....   Count = Count + 1endforend test
> Dan Covill
>
> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> multipart/alternative
>   text/plain (text body -- kept)
>   text/html
> ---
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CACW6n4t_6T-=4pnjnoyy2n++ndzos-mo4b_3mhjvfj-e7_c...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to