Dear Wietse,
Thank you for your reply.
Am 28.03.26 um 16:21 schrieb Wietse Venema via Postfix-users:
Paul Menzel via Postfix-users:
Just to avoid any misunderstandings, I mean the message, the sender of
the force-expired message gets in the "rejection message" which
currently is *message is administratively expired*. Sorry, if my comment
is redundant.
Indeed. My preference would be that it is the reason to hold the
message. How would 'forced expire' distinguish between "missing
SPF" or different reasons?
The postmaster decides, when executing `postsuper -f <id>`. Does that
make sense?
Kind regards,
Paul
_______________________________________________
Postfix-users mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
