[pfx] Re: expected behavior of 3.11 *with* bdb and hash/btree support?

Wed, 01 Apr 2026 13:18:11 -0700 


>>>>> On April 1, 2026 Greg Klanderman via Postfix-users 
>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:

>>>>> On April 1, 2026 Wietse Venema <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Greg Klanderman via Postfix-users:
>>> Further, it seems there is not even the option to use hash/btree
>>> when postfix is compiled with bdb in this release.

>> That is not true. I run postfix with real Berkeley DB. Just don't
>> build with -DNO_DB on Fedora and FreeBSD.

> OK, so it's just a Debian packaging issue then?

> But postfix has been built with BDB support, as postfix -m does
> include hash and btree.  I assume if it had been built with -DNO_DB
> that would not be the case, right?

Hmm, I see my log messages are only warnings:

| warning: /etc/postfix/discard_ehlo_keywords: hash/btree support is 
deprecated.  Please switch to cdb or lmdb.

and not the error message shown in NON_BERKELEYDB_README:

| Berkeley DB support for 'hash:/etc/postfix/virtual' is not available

Possibly it is just that debian does not have 3.11.1 yet, and I'm
getting bit by this bug which was fixed?

|   * Bugfix (defect introduced: 20260219): alias_maps errors when
|     default_database_type was not set in main.cf. Fix by Michael
|     Tokarev.


Greg
_______________________________________________
Postfix-users mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]






















					Reply via email to