postfix-users

[pfx] Postfix code scanning with Claude

Mon, 13 Apr 2026 20:21:20 GMT

2026/04/13 -- Wietse Venema via Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: Let's Encrypt question (maybe EKU?)

Mon, 13 Apr 2026 08:13:20 GMT

2026/04/13 -- 황병희

[pfx] Re: Let's Encrypt question (maybe EKU?)

Sat, 11 Apr 2026 15:05:56 GMT

2026/04/11 -- Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: Let's Encrypt question (maybe EKU?)

Sat, 11 Apr 2026 15:02:05 GMT

2026/04/11 -- Wietse Venema via Postfix-users

[pfx] Let's Encrypt question (maybe EKU?)

Sat, 11 Apr 2026 14:00:47 GMT

2026/04/11 -- 황병희

[pfx] Re: relaying a 550 yields a defer

Fri, 10 Apr 2026 16:58:15 GMT

2026/04/10 -- Randy Bush via Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: relaying a 550 yields a defer

Fri, 10 Apr 2026 14:19:42 GMT

2026/04/10 -- Wietse Venema via Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: relaying a 550 yields a defer

Fri, 10 Apr 2026 03:56:29 GMT

2026/04/10 -- Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: relaying a 550 yields a defer

Fri, 10 Apr 2026 00:12:55 GMT

2026/04/10 -- Wietse Venema via Postfix-users

[pfx] relaying a 550 yields a defer

Thu, 09 Apr 2026 23:50:13 GMT

2026/04/09 -- Randy Bush via Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: help debugging SASL authentication failure: No worthy mechs found

Wed, 08 Apr 2026 23:59:24 GMT

2026/04/08 -- Marvin Renich via Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: help debugging SASL authentication failure: No worthy mechs found

Wed, 08 Apr 2026 19:13:05 GMT

2026/04/08 -- Greg Klanderman via Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: Any way to specify custom string when requesting forced expiration with `postsuper -f`?

Tue, 07 Apr 2026 17:44:26 GMT

2026/04/07 -- Paul Menzel via Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: Any way to specify custom string when requesting forced expiration with `postsuper -f`?

Tue, 07 Apr 2026 17:42:19 GMT

2026/04/07 -- Wietse Venema via Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: Will MTA-STS support and tlsrpt ever wind up in mainline postfix?

Tue, 07 Apr 2026 11:43:59 GMT

2026/04/07 -- 황병희

[pfx] Re: help debugging SASL authentication failure: No worthy mechs found

Mon, 06 Apr 2026 18:02:37 GMT

2026/04/06 -- Greg Klanderman via Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: Question on lmdb - setup

Mon, 06 Apr 2026 05:13:29 GMT

2026/04/06 -- Michael Tokarev via Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: help debugging SASL authentication failure: No worthy mechs found

Mon, 06 Apr 2026 05:08:54 GMT

2026/04/06 -- Michael Tokarev via Postfix-users

[pfx] Question on lmdb - setup

Mon, 06 Apr 2026 04:44:49 GMT

2026/04/06 -- Dr.-Ing. Dieter Jurzitza via Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: help debugging SASL authentication failure: No worthy mechs found

Sun, 05 Apr 2026 22:50:33 GMT

2026/04/05 -- Greg Klanderman via Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: help debugging SASL authentication failure: No worthy mechs found

Sun, 05 Apr 2026 17:37:21 GMT

2026/04/05 -- Michael Tokarev via Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: Will MTA-STS support and tlsrpt ever wind up in mainline postfix?

Sun, 05 Apr 2026 17:08:31 GMT

2026/04/05 -- Dan Mahoney via Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: Will MTA-STS support and tlsrpt ever wind up in mainline postfix?

Sun, 05 Apr 2026 15:08:47 GMT

2026/04/05 -- Ömer Güven via Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: Will MTA-STS support and tlsrpt ever wind up in mainline postfix?

Sun, 05 Apr 2026 14:59:48 GMT

2026/04/05 -- Wietse Venema via Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: Will MTA-STS support and tlsrpt ever wind up in mainline postfix?

Sun, 05 Apr 2026 03:19:37 GMT

2026/04/05 -- 황병희

[pfx] Will MTA-STS support and tlsrpt ever wind up in mainline postfix?

Sun, 05 Apr 2026 01:21:16 GMT

2026/04/05 -- Dan Mahoney via Postfix-users

[pfx] Sorry again (Was: Re: Re: help debugging SASL authentication failure: No worthy mechs found)

Sun, 05 Apr 2026 01:12:11 GMT

2026/04/05 -- 황병희

[pfx] Re: help debugging SASL authentication failure: No worthy mechs found

Sun, 05 Apr 2026 00:56:23 GMT

2026/04/05 -- 황병희

[pfx] Google groups spam

Sat, 04 Apr 2026 22:19:50 GMT

2026/04/04 -- Eugene R via Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: help debugging SASL authentication failure: No worthy mechs found

Sat, 04 Apr 2026 22:18:28 GMT

2026/04/04 -- Greg Klanderman via Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: help debugging SASL authentication failure: No worthy mechs found

Sat, 04 Apr 2026 21:53:48 GMT

2026/04/04 -- Marvin Renich via Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: Google groups spam

Sat, 04 Apr 2026 21:32:33 GMT

2026/04/04 -- Christos Chatzaras via Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: help debugging SASL authentication failure: No worthy mechs found

Sat, 04 Apr 2026 19:06:19 GMT

2026/04/04 -- Greg Klanderman via Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: help debugging SASL authentication failure: No worthy mechs found

Sat, 04 Apr 2026 18:25:55 GMT

2026/04/04 -- Greg Klanderman via Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: help debugging SASL authentication failure: No worthy mechs found

Sat, 04 Apr 2026 13:39:58 GMT

2026/04/04 -- Marvin Renich via Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: help debugging SASL authentication failure: No worthy mechs found

Sat, 04 Apr 2026 13:32:33 GMT

2026/04/04 -- Marvin Renich via Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: help debugging SASL authentication failure: No worthy mechs found

Sat, 04 Apr 2026 09:51:05 GMT

2026/04/04 -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: help debugging SASL authentication failure: No worthy mechs found

Sat, 04 Apr 2026 05:26:42 GMT

2026/04/04 -- Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: help debugging SASL authentication failure: No worthy mechs found

Fri, 03 Apr 2026 19:41:32 GMT

2026/04/03 -- Wietse Venema via Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: help debugging SASL authentication failure: No worthy mechs found

Fri, 03 Apr 2026 19:24:34 GMT

2026/04/03 -- Greg Klanderman via Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: help debugging SASL authentication failure: No worthy mechs found

Fri, 03 Apr 2026 18:59:47 GMT

2026/04/03 -- Wietse Venema via Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: expected behavior of 3.11 with bdb and hash/btree support?

Fri, 03 Apr 2026 18:57:22 GMT

2026/04/03 -- Greg Klanderman via Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: help debugging SASL authentication failure: No worthy mechs found

Fri, 03 Apr 2026 18:28:51 GMT

2026/04/03 -- Greg Klanderman via Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: expected behavior of 3.11 with bdb and hash/btree support?

Fri, 03 Apr 2026 17:34:41 GMT

2026/04/03 -- Wietse Venema via Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: expected behavior of 3.11 with bdb and hash/btree support?

Fri, 03 Apr 2026 17:04:17 GMT

2026/04/03 -- Greg Klanderman via Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: Encrypted connections only

Fri, 03 Apr 2026 16:03:54 GMT

2026/04/03 -- Bill Cole via Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: Encrypted connections only

Fri, 03 Apr 2026 15:33:40 GMT

2026/04/03 -- Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: Encrypted connections only

Fri, 03 Apr 2026 13:55:55 GMT

2026/04/03 -- Paul van der Vlis via Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: Encrypted connections only

Fri, 03 Apr 2026 13:33:59 GMT

2026/04/03 -- 황병희

[pfx] Re: Encrypted connections only

Fri, 03 Apr 2026 13:15:35 GMT

2026/04/03 -- Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: Encrypted connections only

Fri, 03 Apr 2026 13:04:31 GMT

2026/04/03 -- Paul van der Vlis via Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: Encrypted connections only

Fri, 03 Apr 2026 12:14:37 GMT

2026/04/03 -- 황병희

[pfx] Re: Encrypted connections only

Fri, 03 Apr 2026 09:41:07 GMT

2026/04/03 -- Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: Encrypted connections only

Fri, 03 Apr 2026 09:06:08 GMT

2026/04/03 -- Paul van der Vlis via Postfix-users

[pfx] Sorry (Was: Re: Re: Current TLS cipher/protocol recommendations for postfix?)

Fri, 03 Apr 2026 02:40:00 GMT

2026/04/03 -- 황병희

[pfx] Re: Current TLS cipher/protocol recommendations for postfix?

Fri, 03 Apr 2026 02:26:43 GMT

2026/04/03 -- 황병희

[pfx] Re: howto debug "Untrusted TLS connection established from"

Thu, 02 Apr 2026 14:16:58 GMT

2026/04/02 -- Wietse Venema via Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: howto debug "Untrusted TLS connection established from"

Thu, 02 Apr 2026 14:10:12 GMT

2026/04/02 -- A. Schulze via Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: howto debug "Untrusted TLS connection established from"

Thu, 02 Apr 2026 14:03:05 GMT

2026/04/02 -- Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users

[pfx] howto debug "Untrusted TLS connection established from"

Thu, 02 Apr 2026 13:44:27 GMT

2026/04/02 -- A. Schulze via Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: expected behavior of 3.11 with bdb and hash/btree support?

Thu, 02 Apr 2026 13:41:35 GMT

2026/04/02 -- Wietse Venema via Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: Log Header To after recipient canonization

Thu, 02 Apr 2026 13:32:29 GMT

2026/04/02 -- Wietse Venema via Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: Encrypted connections only

Thu, 02 Apr 2026 13:24:44 GMT

2026/04/02 -- Wietse Venema via Postfix-users

[pfx] Log Header To after recipient canonization

Thu, 02 Apr 2026 11:45:39 GMT

2026/04/02 -- Peter Uetrecht via Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: Encrypted connections only

Thu, 02 Apr 2026 09:44:31 GMT

2026/04/02 -- Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users

[pfx] Encrypted connections only

Thu, 02 Apr 2026 08:37:57 GMT

2026/04/02 -- Paul van der Vlis via Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: help debugging SASL authentication failure: No worthy mechs found

Thu, 02 Apr 2026 01:22:17 GMT

2026/04/02 -- Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: expected behavior of 3.11 with bdb and hash/btree support?

Thu, 02 Apr 2026 00:28:21 GMT

2026/04/02 -- Wietse Venema via Postfix-users

[pfx] help debugging SASL authentication failure: No worthy mechs found

Thu, 02 Apr 2026 00:27:13 GMT

2026/04/02 -- Greg Klanderman via Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: expected behavior of 3.11 with bdb and hash/btree support?

Wed, 01 Apr 2026 23:37:22 GMT

2026/04/01 -- Greg Klanderman via Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: expected behavior of 3.11 with bdb and hash/btree support?

Wed, 01 Apr 2026 20:18:11 GMT

2026/04/01 -- Greg Klanderman via Postfix-users

[pfx] expected behavior of 3.11 with bdb and hash/btree support?

Wed, 01 Apr 2026 18:23:57 GMT

2026/04/01 -- Greg Klanderman via Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: Current TLS cipher/protocol recommendations for postfix?

Wed, 01 Apr 2026 06:14:39 GMT

2026/04/01 -- Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: MTA-STS without DNSSEC - does it do anything (for google)

Wed, 01 Apr 2026 06:10:38 GMT

2026/04/01 -- Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: Current TLS cipher/protocol recommendations for postfix?

Wed, 01 Apr 2026 05:25:22 GMT

2026/04/01 -- Dan Mahoney via Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: Current TLS cipher/protocol recommendations for postfix?

Wed, 01 Apr 2026 02:49:06 GMT

2026/04/01 -- Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: MTA-STS without DNSSEC - does it do anything (for google)

Wed, 01 Apr 2026 02:20:38 GMT

2026/04/01 -- Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: feasibility of REQUIRETLS, *_tls_security_level > may

Wed, 01 Apr 2026 02:00:17 GMT

2026/04/01 -- Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: Current TLS cipher/protocol recommendations for postfix?

Tue, 31 Mar 2026 23:27:06 GMT

2026/03/31 -- Dan Mahoney via Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: Current TLS cipher/protocol recommendations for postfix?

Tue, 31 Mar 2026 23:11:38 GMT

2026/03/31 -- Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: feasibility of REQUIRETLS, *_tls_security_level > may

Tue, 31 Mar 2026 21:52:44 GMT

2026/03/31 -- Wietse Venema via Postfix-users

[pfx] Current TLS cipher/protocol recommendations for postfix?

Tue, 31 Mar 2026 21:24:05 GMT

2026/03/31 -- Dan Mahoney via Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: MTA-STS without DNSSEC - does it do anything (for google)

Tue, 31 Mar 2026 20:45:12 GMT

2026/03/31 -- Curtis Villamizar via Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: feasibility of REQUIRETLS, *_tls_security_level > may

Tue, 31 Mar 2026 20:40:14 GMT

2026/03/31 -- Curtis Villamizar via Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: feasibility of REQUIRETLS, *_tls_security_level > may

Tue, 31 Mar 2026 13:05:32 GMT

2026/03/31 -- Wietse Venema via Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: MTA-STS without DNSSEC - does it do anything (for google)

Tue, 31 Mar 2026 13:03:36 GMT

2026/03/31 -- Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: feasibility of REQUIRETLS, *_tls_security_level > may

Tue, 31 Mar 2026 12:55:42 GMT

2026/03/31 -- Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users

[pfx] MTA-STS without DNSSEC - does it do anything (for google)

Tue, 31 Mar 2026 12:22:26 GMT

2026/03/31 -- Curtis Villamizar via Postfix-users

[pfx] feasibility of REQUIRETLS, *_tls_security_level > may

Tue, 31 Mar 2026 12:20:35 GMT

2026/03/31 -- Curtis Villamizar via Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: Any way to specify custom string when requesting forced expiration with `postsuper -f`?

Sat, 28 Mar 2026 15:21:51 GMT

2026/03/28 -- Wietse Venema via Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: Disabling MUA submission for smtpd on port 25

Sat, 28 Mar 2026 13:20:41 GMT

2026/03/28 -- John Fawcett via Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: Disabling MUA submission for smtpd on port 25

Sat, 28 Mar 2026 13:14:42 GMT

2026/03/28 -- Jim Seymour via Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: TLS deployment scenarios with Postfix

Sat, 28 Mar 2026 12:54:13 GMT

2026/03/28 -- Sad Clouds via Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: Disabling MUA submission for smtpd on port 25

Sat, 28 Mar 2026 12:51:30 GMT

2026/03/28 -- John Fawcett via Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: TLS deployment scenarios with Postfix

Sat, 28 Mar 2026 11:33:54 GMT

2026/03/28 -- Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: Any way to specify custom string when requesting forced expiration with `postsuper -f`?

Sat, 28 Mar 2026 09:01:19 GMT

2026/03/28 -- Paul Menzel via Postfix-users

[pfx] TLS deployment scenarios with Postfix

Sat, 28 Mar 2026 08:33:26 GMT

2026/03/28 -- Sad Clouds via Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: Any way to specify custom string when requesting forced expiration with `postsuper -f`?

Fri, 27 Mar 2026 14:45:33 GMT

2026/03/27 -- Wietse Venema via Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: Any way to specify custom string when requesting forced expiration with `postsuper -f`?

Fri, 27 Mar 2026 12:51:31 GMT

2026/03/27 -- Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users

[pfx] Any way to specify custom string when requesting forced expiration with `postsuper -f`?

Fri, 27 Mar 2026 08:35:50 GMT

2026/03/27 -- Paul Menzel via Postfix-users

postfix-users

[pfx] Postfix code scanning with Claude

[pfx] Re: Let's Encrypt question (maybe EKU?)

[pfx] Re: Let's Encrypt question (maybe EKU?)

[pfx] Re: Let's Encrypt question (maybe EKU?)

[pfx] Let's Encrypt question (maybe EKU?)

[pfx] Re: relaying a 550 yields a defer

[pfx] Re: relaying a 550 yields a defer

[pfx] Re: relaying a 550 yields a defer

[pfx] Re: relaying a 550 yields a defer

[pfx] relaying a 550 yields a defer

[pfx] Re: help debugging SASL authentication failure: No worthy mechs found

[pfx] Re: help debugging SASL authentication failure: No worthy mechs found

[pfx] Re: Any way to specify custom string when requesting forced expiration with `postsuper -f`?

[pfx] Re: Any way to specify custom string when requesting forced expiration with `postsuper -f`?

[pfx] Re: Will MTA-STS support and tlsrpt ever wind up in mainline postfix?

[pfx] Re: help debugging SASL authentication failure: No worthy mechs found

[pfx] Re: Question on lmdb - setup

[pfx] Re: help debugging SASL authentication failure: No worthy mechs found

[pfx] Question on lmdb - setup

[pfx] Re: help debugging SASL authentication failure: No worthy mechs found

[pfx] Re: help debugging SASL authentication failure: No worthy mechs found

[pfx] Re: Will MTA-STS support and tlsrpt ever wind up in mainline postfix?

[pfx] Re: Will MTA-STS support and tlsrpt ever wind up in mainline postfix?

[pfx] Re: Will MTA-STS support and tlsrpt ever wind up in mainline postfix?

[pfx] Re: Will MTA-STS support and tlsrpt ever wind up in mainline postfix?

[pfx] Will MTA-STS support and tlsrpt ever wind up in mainline postfix?

[pfx] Sorry again (Was: Re: Re: help debugging SASL authentication failure: No worthy mechs found)

[pfx] Re: help debugging SASL authentication failure: No worthy mechs found

[pfx] Google groups spam

[pfx] Re: help debugging SASL authentication failure: No worthy mechs found

[pfx] Re: help debugging SASL authentication failure: No worthy mechs found

[pfx] Re: Google groups spam

[pfx] Re: help debugging SASL authentication failure: No worthy mechs found

[pfx] Re: help debugging SASL authentication failure: No worthy mechs found

[pfx] Re: help debugging SASL authentication failure: No worthy mechs found

[pfx] Re: help debugging SASL authentication failure: No worthy mechs found

[pfx] Re: help debugging SASL authentication failure: No worthy mechs found

[pfx] Re: help debugging SASL authentication failure: No worthy mechs found

[pfx] Re: help debugging SASL authentication failure: No worthy mechs found

[pfx] Re: help debugging SASL authentication failure: No worthy mechs found

[pfx] Re: help debugging SASL authentication failure: No worthy mechs found

[pfx] Re: expected behavior of 3.11 *with* bdb and hash/btree support?

[pfx] Re: help debugging SASL authentication failure: No worthy mechs found

[pfx] Re: expected behavior of 3.11 *with* bdb and hash/btree support?

[pfx] Re: expected behavior of 3.11 *with* bdb and hash/btree support?

[pfx] Re: Encrypted connections only

[pfx] Re: Encrypted connections only

[pfx] Re: Encrypted connections only

[pfx] Re: Encrypted connections only

[pfx] Re: Encrypted connections only

[pfx] Re: Encrypted connections only

[pfx] Re: Encrypted connections only

[pfx] Re: Encrypted connections only

[pfx] Re: Encrypted connections only

[pfx] Sorry (Was: Re: Re: Current TLS cipher/protocol recommendations for postfix?)

[pfx] Re: Current TLS cipher/protocol recommendations for postfix?

[pfx] Re: howto debug "Untrusted TLS connection established from"

[pfx] Re: howto debug "Untrusted TLS connection established from"

[pfx] Re: howto debug "Untrusted TLS connection established from"

[pfx] howto debug "Untrusted TLS connection established from"

[pfx] Re: expected behavior of 3.11 *with* bdb and hash/btree support?

[pfx] Re: Log Header To after recipient canonization

[pfx] Re: Encrypted connections only

[pfx] Log Header To after recipient canonization

[pfx] Re: Encrypted connections only

[pfx] Encrypted connections only

[pfx] Re: help debugging SASL authentication failure: No worthy mechs found

[pfx] Re: expected behavior of 3.11 *with* bdb and hash/btree support?

[pfx] help debugging SASL authentication failure: No worthy mechs found

[pfx] Re: expected behavior of 3.11 *with* bdb and hash/btree support?

[pfx] Re: expected behavior of 3.11 *with* bdb and hash/btree support?

[pfx] expected behavior of 3.11 *with* bdb and hash/btree support?

[pfx] Re: Current TLS cipher/protocol recommendations for postfix?

[pfx] Re: MTA-STS without DNSSEC - does it do anything (for google)

[pfx] Re: Current TLS cipher/protocol recommendations for postfix?

[pfx] Re: Current TLS cipher/protocol recommendations for postfix?

[pfx] Re: MTA-STS without DNSSEC - does it do anything (for google)

[pfx] Re: feasibility of REQUIRETLS, *_tls_security_level > may

[pfx] Re: Current TLS cipher/protocol recommendations for postfix?

[pfx] Re: expected behavior of 3.11 with bdb and hash/btree support?

[pfx] Re: expected behavior of 3.11 with bdb and hash/btree support?

[pfx] Re: expected behavior of 3.11 with bdb and hash/btree support?

[pfx] Re: expected behavior of 3.11 with bdb and hash/btree support?

[pfx] Re: expected behavior of 3.11 with bdb and hash/btree support?

[pfx] Re: expected behavior of 3.11 with bdb and hash/btree support?

[pfx] Re: expected behavior of 3.11 with bdb and hash/btree support?

[pfx] expected behavior of 3.11 with bdb and hash/btree support?